Apologies. A thousand apologies.
There were so many supportive and helpful comments on my last post that I meant to come back and respond to and instead, some other things happened and I hid my head in the sand. Not in an entirely bad way, just in a way that meant I was only dealing with what was essential.
Change is afoot. That’s what’s shaken me recently. And it’s change that I’ve instigated, but it just felt a lot less scary when I was planning it, rather than actually moving forward with it. I’ll elaborate in another post, because the main reason for this post is … the response from the CMHT regarding my complaint.
Sigh.
I wasn’t entirely naive when I made the complaint. I figured that any response was going to centre on their apologising for my misunderstanding things. Pointless, frustrating, yes, but I felt like I still needed to make the complaint. I wasn’t anticipating being called a liar. I wasn’t prepared for exactly how condescending it was and how many of their facts that I disagree with.
The letter arrived on Friday, and I managed to skim read it before getting so angry that it went back into its envelope until today.
There is a page of gubbins about how sorry the Trust was that I felt the need to complain and about how the complaint was dealt with. Then, on to the response about that dreaded appointment with the New Consultant and Care Co-ordinator…. (facetious comments all my own):
The Trust is “disappointed to read that you were unhappy with the way Dr F conducted his assessment. Dr F explained carefully that he would be performing a mental state examination and what would be involved. Dr F is sorry if this made you feel uncomfortable. Dr F noted that you appeared to have a squint in your right eye and remarked on this because it was not mentioned in your previous records, (would it be noted on there? So far this squint remains undetectable to everyone apart from Dr F, so it’d hardly a distinguishing feature). A squint may be contributing factor to visual hallucinations you made reference to and Dr F wanted to ensure this was examined for you, as is good practice, (I maintain that whilst a squint could cause visual disturbances, I fail to see how it can cause a person to hallucinate woodland creatures and people with scary demon-voiced faces. Plus, I still think that it would have been sensible to wait until any physical cause had been ruled out before discharging me. My eyes are fine, my blood tests are clear …. seeing stuff scares me and now although I can deal with it most of the time, I know it’s not how things are supposed to be). During the assessment, Dr F referred to your earlier diagnosis and explained that diagnoses can change and are not set in stone. It would appear that you misunderstood Dr F in this respect, as he confirms that he did not say that diagnoses are not important, (as far as I recall, he did, but, hey ho…)
In the appointment, Dr F also asked a series of questions as part of a standard assessment. These questions are designed to review current mental health needs, as an assessment is not a counselling session, (I know this. I wasn’t expecting a counselling session. I didn’t want a counselling session). Dr F has confirmed from his notes that he did not say that your “experiences were not far removed from what is normal” and can only apologise if you have misunderstood what was said in this respect, (ah yes, the most lukewarm of backhanded apologies. I’m pretty sure I didn’t misunderstand because I asked him to clarify this at the time. That was when he said there was nothing in my history to suggest I had a mental illness. But nevermind, silly me, must have misheard that bit) . You have also made reference to Dr F’s suggestion that the fact you have a full-time job is an indication you are doing well. Dr F has clarified that he said to you that having a job is therapeutic (I agree) and did not say “you’re still doing your job, so it can’t be that bad” (he did). Dr F notes that in your complaint you referred to a person-centred approach, however, he was very clear with you that this was an assessment and not a counselling session, (I did refer to a holistic approach that took into account what being “well” or “ill” meant for each particular patient, rather than applying a blanket approach to all patients. However, it seems that he’s fixed upon this to argue that I was expecting a counselling appointment and therefore the error is mine). Again, Dr F is sorry for any misunderstanding (gee, thanks). Dr F concluded the assessment with his view that your GP was best placed to sustain your care, (I agreed that the CMHT was providing me with nothing positive, however, I also explained to him that my GP practice had been clear that they had concerns with managing my care and had stipulated that they would prefer me to be monitored by the CMHT. Although not keen to remain under the CMHT, I felt it would have been sensible to liaise with my GP before discharging me. Nevermind).
Dr F has also clarified that your diagnosis has not been removed from your medical records held by the Trust. It is standard practice to ensure that all service users seen by the Trust have a documented mental health diagnosis and I can assure you that we have not altered your records in light of your discharge from the CMHT, (this confuses me. He stated that he did not think I had bipolar, or indeed, any mental illness. If this were true, then my diagnosis, as recorded on the record, would be wrong, surely? It seems contradictory to me. The question I had asked about not knowing what to do about my medication ie should I be taking drugs for a condition he stated I don’t have, hasn’t been answered).
Dr F is sorry to note your dissatisfaction with his assessment and has asked that I include his apologies with this reply.
As part of his investigation, Mr L also spoke to {Care Co-ordinator} about the issues you raised in relation to the care (!! Not the word I would use) she provided you. CC was sorry to read that you were unhappy with aspects of the care she provided you particularly in the examples where you feel CC spent more time talking about herself in relation to issues around weight loss and having children. CC recalls talking to you in a therapeutic context (in her eyes, maybe) about weight and you are noted as being grateful for the discussion, (she may have noted that. She didn’t ask me if I find it helpful. Mostly I probably just smiled and nodded until she left. My bad). However, CC has clarified that she did not discuss her own children with you and is clear that she did not suggest that you put on some make up when she visited you at home, (this is the comment that infuriates me the most. She did make that comment about the make up and I was devastated. And, if she didn’t talk to me about her children, then how do I know that she has four of them – two teenagers, then a big age gap until the two younger ones and that most of her salary goes on childcare? Did I make that up? No). CC has asked me to convey her apologies for any misunderstanding or distress caused, as this was not her intention.
CC has commented that her role in the assessment appointment on 28th Feb was to ensure that Dr F, who very carefully prepares for each assessment in advance, did not overlook an aspect of your care to date and current presentation. It was not CC’s intention to appear unsupportive, however, she felt Dr F had undertaken a very thorough assessment and there was nothing of significance she could add, given that this was an assessment appointment and not a counselling session, (seriously, I KNEW IT WASN’T A COUNSELLING SESSION….ARRGGHH). Furthermore, CC has clarified that she did not laugh off the concerns you had raised about the failed appointment on 1st Feb, nor did she admit to it being her error, (err, she did, just not to you). It is clear that there was an unfortunate misunderstanding and CC is genuinely sorry for the upset that this caused you.
…then five more paragraphs about the Trust being committed to being a professional and appropriate provider of mental health care and what I can do if I’m not satisfied with the response.
I’m not satisfied, but not in any way that I think could be resolved. I appreciate that it must be hard to investigate a complaint when it’s one person’s word against another, particularly when one of those people is employed by your employers. I think I feel angry about the suggestion that I’ve lied, misunderstood, exaggerated, or been attention seeking. If, where there are no dodgy test results to disprove or plaster casts on the wrong arm to provide an objective basis to a complaint, the investigator is always going to come down on the side of the Trust, what is the point?
I also applied for and received copies of my medical records from the CMHT. So far I’ve managed to read a page of them, (I caught a glimpse of a paragraph that said my GP records are over a foot high – surely not?! I keep looking at the ruler on my desk and imagining that stack of paper and I feel so ashamed. Worryingly, it also stated that there were no notes from the time I was in Scotland. Helpful) and then they were put away. I wish I could remove any trace of myself from NHS databases. I want to be fine. And I am mostly fine at the moment. Wobbly at times, by managing. I’m scared of what might happen if I stop being fine – either physically or mentally, because I feel like I have no faith in medical professionals anymore. All my old fears of being called a time-waster, that stopped me seeking help until things were really bad, is back, full force. I’m terrified of having to see a doctor, imagining what they might be writing about me, the judgements that they’re making. Oh yes, and how I might be misunderstanding what they’re saying …



